The current state of cyber war in the world

Drama. Drama – the basis for the story. We must examine well this stone to make a realistic virtual experience. We must look to understand what CyberWar or as specified.

If we talk about cyberwar, hyperbole and metaphor with & # 39 are the rule rather than the exception. Kibertsis, kiberhat – you may have noticed that the virtual world inhabited by nouns and verbs taken from the material world, and that the image kibertyngav in the news, tend to have a dramatic picture of the physical things rather than the electrons that make up kibersvetu. Images Coin inhabit stories with pure virtual cryptocurrency, such as BitCoin. Exceptions to this rule may, Physics magazines where readers are really interested in the electrons and mathematics kiberreala.

But when we read stories about cyber war, we see photographs of soldiers, guns and materials that accompany the story. When we read about people who sit at their desks and computers, to learn how to crack, not hack them, we call them CyberWarriors, and photographs of people wearing jackets and helmets accompany these stories. Interestingly, the CyberItem will be accompanied by photographs of tanks and bombers.

Besides CyberWar, except dramatic illustrations and photos? In 2010, Richard Clarke, former Special Advisor to the President for Cyber ​​Security, identified kibervaennuyu struggle as a "nation-state actions to penetrate into your computer & # 39; yutery or other countries with the purpose of causing harm or disruption." It is noteworthy that the national state is necessary to recognize the offender. If this is true, then we might have already participated in the multi-year cyber-wars against attacks both from China, Russia, the USA, Israel, Georgia, Ukraine, Korea, Syria, Iran, Estonia and many other things. Although the country has always denied this, have the exact figures, confirming the evidence that these countries establish digital intruders at each other, network, computers and data. Suffered damage mentioned networks, computers and data.

Yes, of course, there were cyberattacks and states. But is it CyberWar? Dr. Thomas Reed, professor of security studies in the College of King, said that cyber war is not. He is inclined to define cyberwar in terms of disasters on physical infrastructure – scenario, when the water stops "flowing, lights go out, train derailment, banks are losing our financial records, the road descends into chaos, elevators fail, and planes fall from the sky." And he says that this does not happen. In fact, he has a book in 2013 titled "Cyber ​​war will not take place."

Others are not so sanguine in the subject and opportunities. In the United States, including the fall in public spending in most areas, the budget Cyber ​​Command is growing rapidly. This is almost twice a year: $ 118 million in 2012, $ 212 million in 2013 and $ 447 million in 2014. It buys a lot of electrons, a lot of code and many kibervaennikav (without jackets). . These increases result in a similar, though not as sharp inflation kiberbyuzhetav in other countries.

With all cybertools and those who created won anyone tempted to use them? CyberWar inevitable, is there a way out? This is a question of ethics perceive sur & # 39; ozna. Great thinkers such as Patrick Lin, Fritz Alhof and Neil C. Rowe, was co-authored several articles, such as "Is it possible to just a cyber-war"? and War 2.0: cyber weapons and ethics to search for alternatives. There are laws (conventional) war and there should be a similar recommendation on kiberkanfliktah. Yesterday is not soon start suras & # 39; ozna refers to these issues.

When we try to answer the phrase that a & # 39 is the title of this article, it should be all over the map, because the definition of cyber war is, as in this article, all over the map. Actually and literally around the world. Definition of cyber war is different from country to country and from organization to organization. An article entitled "The Wild West of kibervaennay struggle" trying sur & # 39; ozna designate such different ideas on this subject, in spite of its title. The discussion is helpful, but his conclusion is necessarily amorphous.

Guide to Tallinn on 302 pages – the result of three years of research experts on the subject who are trying to establish such a definition. It can be read free of charge. But the conclusions drawn here do not adhere to all potential participants kiberkanfliktav.

Well, that is the best answer we can give to the state CyberWar in the world? Worldwide cyber attacks. They carried out several public sub & # 39 objects and persons without citizenship. They perform public sub & # 39; objects that blame on other countries and on sub & # 39 objects without citizenship, on which they claim to have no control and input, but nevertheless, they are politically tuned. They continue haktyvisty seeking political change through off sites, networks and information. They continue to those who have a pure profit motive. And they continue to use the wells that just find joy in the little chaos.

All such attacks are increasing, although most remain relatively imperfect actions, such as a common denial of service (DDoS). However, little evidence to suggest that the path of the physical infrastructure is a lot. There is little evidence that people caused by physical trauma. It is not known, in fact, such events come to pass.

Dr. Reed said that they won & # 39; ie. by Drs Lin, Alhof and Rowe suggest a way to avoid such harm. Richard Clarke and former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta believes that it is inevitable, and we must prepare – in tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Albert Einstein was well said: "You can not simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." Let's hope that he was wrong in the case of cyber-warfare.